Article suitable for older students
Find out moreStone cutters at work, Florentine Codex Book X
ORIGINAL QUESTION received from - and thanks to - Jon: I’m trying to study information on Aztec tools. I’ve learned a lot about copper and bronze axes and I’ve learned a lot about obsidian, but I’ve heard the Aztecs used a lot of groundstone tools as well, like basalt or jadeite celts. Were stone axes even still used in Postclassic Central Mexico??? (Answer compiled by Ian Mursell/Mexicolore)
It appears so! Having said that, it has to be recognised that ‘at the moment, much more is known about the range of stone products than of the techniques for making them’ (Clark 2001: 139). Esther Pasztory, in her classic work Aztec Art (1983) includes a lengthy, beautifully illustrated chapter on Stone Sculpture, but no mention is made of the tools used in their crafting...
The first part of your message is easy to answer and illustrate: the Mexica did indeed use large quantities of basalt in every-day life. In his detailed study of Otumba, a once thriving Aztec craft-making centre, (Professor) Michael E. Smith (on our Panel of Experts) recorded: ‘Basalt, a hard and porous volcanic rock readily available in the Otumba region, was worked into both domestic implements (such as manos and metates for grinding corn), and industrial tools (scrapers for loosening the fibres from maguey leaves and polishers for finishing lapidary products) (2003: 102).
You can learn more about metates (corn grinding stones) and molcajetes (pestles-and-mortars) from our individual features on these (links below). Incidentally, both were tribute items documented in the Codex Mendoza, and, according to the eminent Mexican historian Francisco del Paso y Troncoso it was basalt grinding stones from the province of Hueypuchtla, north of the Basin of Mexico, that were ‘the best that can be found in this land’ (quoted in Berdan and Anawalt, vol. II, 56).
Book XI of the encyclopaedic Florentine Codex includes a Nahua description of basalt (‘stones from which metates are made’): ‘It is black, dark, hard; it is ground. It is solid, round, wide; asperous, scabrous, unpleasing, blemished. It is [material] which can be fashioned well, worked, pecked, smoothed, abraded, sculptured. I work a metate. I work a mano. I hammer out a metate’ (Anderson & Dibble, 1963: 263).
The reference here to ‘pecking’ the basalt is important. In his comprehensive study of Mesoamerican lithic technology, John E. Clark explains: ‘Brittle stones with predictable fracture properties, such as obsidian and chert (flint), were shaped by controlled chipping to make an impressive variety of razor-sharp cutting implements. Tougher, more fibrous stones, such as jade, were shaped initially by fracture and subsequently by pecking, grinding, and polishing... Softer stones, such as limestone or alabaster, could be cut, carved, and drilled to make assorted items, ranging from large monuments to elaborate stone bowls’ (2001: 136).
Scholars agree that the basic techniques of stone working throughout Mesoamerica had been known and followed for thousands of years. Being found most commonly in highland regions, obsidian and chert (flint) cutting tools and items made of jade and basalt were amongst the most important stone products commonly traded to resource-poor lowland regions.
Basalt metates were generally ‘sculpted from parent material by pecking away or pulverising unwanted portions of the rock to achieve a desired form. Hand-held picks made of tough stones such as quartzite or chert were used to remove minute fragments of the parent stone with each blow. The process was analogous to sculpting with a chisel without the hammer’ (ibid, 137).
‘Axes made of tough stones were another essential Mesoamerican tool. Some were chipped from chert and fine-grained basalt by direct percussion and used without further modification. The most highly prized axes, however, were made of jade. Manufacture of jade axes required a combination of chipped and ground stone techniques, plus final finishing by abrasion and polishing’ (ibid).
In summary, in Mesoamerica ‘the techniques and skills of stone technology reached their fullest flowering’ (Townsend 2000: 186), and the Aztecs acquired their tradition of monumental stone carving first from Atzcapotzalco, and subsequently from the Huaxtecs of the Gulf Coast.
Sources/references:-
• Berdan, Frances F. & Anawalt, Patricia Rieff (1997) The Essential Codex Mendoza, University of California Press, London
• Clark, John E. (2001) ‘Lithic Technology’ in The Oxford Encyclopedia of Mesoamerican Cultures, editor-in-chief Davíd Carrasco, Vol. 2, OUP
• Florentine Codex, Book 11 - Earthly Things (1963), trans. Charles E. Dibble & Arthur J. O. Anderson, School of American Research and the University of Utah, Part XII
• Smith, Michael E. (2003) The Aztecs, 2nd. edition, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford
• Townsend, Richard F. (2000) The Aztecs, 2nd. edition, Thames & Hudson Ltd., London.
Picture sources:-
• Main and pic 4: images from the Florentine Codex scanned from our own copy of the Club Internacional del Libro 3-volume facsimile edition, Madrid, 1994
• Pic 1: illustration scanned from The Everyday Life of the Maya by Ralph Whitlock, B. T. Batsford Ltd., 1976
• Pic 2: illustration commissioned for and © Mexicolore, by Felipe Dávalos
• Pic 3: illustration scanned from Los Dioses Creados, Enciclopedia gráfica del México antiguo, by Salvador Mateos Higuera, Secretaría de Hacienda y Crédito Público, Mexico City, 1993
• Pic 5: image downloaded from https://www.ebay.com/itm/274422351558.
Jon
26th Jun 2023
So, that picture from the Florentine Codex resembles a stone maul (sledgehammer) a lot more than an axe, which would make sense considering it’s being used to crack a boulder and it’s also a common mining tool.
I’m not sure if jade axes were ever common as a utilitarian tool, maybe in the Classic but the best I can find for the Postclassic is some smaller ones (smaller than Pic 5) used as chisels.
I did find a picture of two groundstone basalt celts at the MNA in CDMX, but no info on if they were meant to be tools or not. There’s also a stone tray filled with small votive greenstone celts, from the Templo Mayor IIRC.
The closest I could find to utilitarian stone axes in the Postclassic was knapped basalt, not ground, although I suppose that doesn’t leave out the possibility of groundstone celts. Just that few papers seem to actually discuss it.
Mexicolore
Thanks for sharing this info. Looks like you’re in a better position to research this than we are! We’ll continue to keep your question ‘live’ in the hope of discovering more. It’s an intriguing one...
Stone cutters at work, Florentine Codex Book X