Households and Daily Life in Mesoamerica

Like us, all ancient Mesoamericans had some place to call home. Given the strong cultural contacts between different parts of Mesoamerica, there is a great deal that people shared in how they conceived of and constructed domestic space. Yet households also varied based on regional traditions, environmental conditions, societal organization, and changes in these through time. For instance, rural Mesoamericans often resided in clusters of houses made mostly from perishable materials such as wood or adobe that decay more quickly and therefore can be harder for archaeologists to find. These were typically organized around a patio and were spaced some distance from their neighbors, with fields or gardens between them. In contrast, city dwellers often resided in rectangular compounds or even multi-family apartment blocks that were made of more durable materials, such as stone or concrete. In some cities - like Teotihuacan (pic 1), Tenochtitlan, and Mayapan - residences were tightly packed together. Rulers of Aztec and Maya cites often resided in large palaces, sometimes having one in the capital city and other royal retreats in the countryside. Studies of households therefore capture much of the important social and cultural variability in ancient Mesoamerican societies.

Pic 1: Model of an apartment compound at Teotihuacan; Museo de América, Madrid

As is the case with many aspects of Mesoamerica, our best historical sources come from the Aztec core of central Mexico, since this became the center of the viceroyalty of New Spain and was documented extensively by Spaniards, Nahuatl speaking Aztecs, and mixed Spanish-Native mestizos. Among the many elements of Aztec life documented by the Franciscan friar Bernardino de Sahagún are types of houses, ranging from simple perishable structures to royal palaces (pic 3). One simple type of house made of pole-and-thatch covered in clay (or wattle-and-daub) was called a xacalli in the Aztec language Nahuatl (pronounced sha-cal-li and meaning “earthen house”). This word became jacal in Spanish and is likely the origin of the English word shack. We also have Nahuatl terms for the patio-groups that archaeologists excavate, marking them as important social units. These include cemithualtia (“those who share a patio”) and in quiahuatl, in ithualli (“the exit, the patio”). The linguistic correspondence between shared domestic architecture and social groups provides a basis for connecting archaeological houses to the social groups who once occupied them.

Pic 3: Types of houses documented by Sahagún’s informants from the Aztec city of Tlatelolco, in the 16th century Florentine Codex. Construction materials range from simple pole-and-thatch structures to multi-room palaces made of stone masonry

The eruption of Popocatepetl had the effect of driving migrants to the north and east away from affected areas. Many of those who went north settled at Teotihuacan, contributing to its rise as the largest Mesoamerican city during the Classic period (ca. 1-550 CE). Here, the Teotihuacanos developed a type of residential architecture that was unique in Mesoamerica. Known by archaeologists as the apartment compound, these residential units housed nearly all of the city’s population, estimated to have been over 100,000 residents. Apartment compounds retained patios with central altars as organizing features, but were inhabited by multiple families living in room blocks bounded by large exterior walls (pic 5). Teotihuacan may be one of the few cases, or the only, in the premodern world where nearly all the residents of a large city lived in apartments. There is evidence of abundant craft activities in every apartment compound that has been studied archaeologically, likely providing a clue to their function: by grouping dozens of people together in communal compounds, Teotihuacanos divided labor tasks among extended families, creating a strong domestic economy that could be effectively taxed by the Teotihuacan state. It seems that in most cases Teotihuacan’s apartment compounds were patrilocal, and women would move in with their husband’s family after marriage. But in a neighborhood of merchants with ties to the Gulf of Mexico this pattern seems to have been reversed, and local women from Teotihuacan maintained the household while men moved goods between the central highlands and Gulf lowlands.

Pic 5: Floor plan of the Tlamimilolpa apartment compound at Teotihuacan. Redrawn and modified from Linné (2003)

We are also fortunate to have a Maya village that, like Tetimpa, was preserved by a volcanic eruption. The site of Cerén, El Salvador, has well-preserved patio groups separated by agricultural fields, some of which even had the lower stalks of the crops growing on them preserved. Years of analysis by Payson Sheets and colleagues demonstrate that even rural Maya could live in decorated houses. It also shows that families wisely stored their sharp obsidian blades in the thatch of their roofs, where they would be safely away from children or bare feet. Ethnographic work among Maya communities illustrates how houses, like other structures, are conceived of by Mesoamericans as animate buildings, with physical attributes like a body and requiring to be ritually “fed” through offerings. Picture 7 illustrates some architectural terms for a Yucatec Maya house and its relation to parts of the body, including a “head,” “back,” and “butt.”

Pic 7: Terms for architectural components of a Yucatec Maya house matching parts of the body