Article suitable for older students
Find out more16th Apr 2025
The sacred toad, from an engraving on a stela at Izapa
Far from being just a humble herald of the Mesoamerican rainy season, the toad was a sacred creature with multiple associations - ranging from agricultural fertility to shamanism, from power and strength to the very basis of the ancient 20-day ritual calendar... (Compiled by Ian Mursell/Mexicolore)
Scholars agree that the toad has played an important role in Mesoamerican religious symbolism since late Preclassic times (c. 300 BCE to 250 CE). Stone sculptures, in the form of reliefs on stelae, large 3-D renditions a metre or more in length (see main picture above) and so-called ‘toad-altars’ have been found at Izapa, Chiapas, that may have acted as ‘platforms’ for performances ‘in which the stelae themselves were featured as the “performer”... stelae rose above the toad altars at their feet just as rulers were “reborn” from the altars at their feet’ (Kappelman 2004: 116).
There appears to be plenty of evidence that Mesoamericans have used toads in their rituals from very early on in their history (Hellmuth 2011: 3), aware as they were of a unique feature of certain toad species (in particular, in one of the most toxic, the marine/giant toad, Bufus marinus, whose range now extends from Brazil up to Florida) - the production of powerful chemicals in its skin glands, some of which are poisonous, even deadly (Benson 1997: 94).
‘A psychoactive drug can be made from the toxin of this toad. Its manufacture may have been accomplished for ritual use, ca. 1000 B.C., by the Olmec on the Gulf Coast of Mexico, who left in their middens many remains of this toad’ (ibid).
To what extent this toxin may have been used for medicinal or hallucinogenic purposes (or both) remains unclear, but it continues to be used in modern folk curing practices today (Benson 2001: 421).
Toads were considered sacred not only for their hallucinogenic qualities, but for important practical reasons. They devour insects that destroy maize crops and hence have been called ‘guardians of the corn’ (Rote 2019: 132).
As well as (like bats) controlling damaging insect populations and hence protecting valuable crops, toads, like frogs, may croak and dance (hop) at the onset of the rainy season, ‘when the newly planted cornfields are filled with toads singing and mating in the first spring showers’ (Morris 1987: 30); not surprisingly they have long been universal messengers of seasonality, associated with moisture, the earth (which their skin resembles), agricultural fertility, and with the moon through its control of tides and all bodies of water on earth (Milbrath 1999: 119). Even today, these creatures are vital to rain ceremonies, in some of which ‘young boys at the corners of altars imitate frogs “croaking” for rain’, reflecting an ancient ritual depicted in the Madrid Codex (pic 3) (Kristan-Graham 2023: 140, 143; Benson 2001: 421).
Seasonality is also linked to metamorphosis: ‘Toads are transformative, changing from eggs to tadpoles to toadlets to toads at the beginning of the rainy season... Their appearance as transformed creatures welcomed the time of planting’ (Rote 2019: 128). For good reason the Zapotecs call the toad xini cocijo - ‘son of the rain god’ (Seler 2008: 285).
Toads are, in Elizabeth Benson’s words, ‘metaphors for regeneration: they shed their old skin and look fresh and new’ (2001: 421). What’s more, seasonality and fertility are emphasised again in their life cycle ‘for they seem to disappear into the earth during the dry season and reemerge with the onset of the rains’ (Milbrath 2023: 406). Their eggs are easy to see in water (Baquedano 2023: 168), and, being clear with a black dot in the middle, the huge numbers appear to mimic the stars in the sky, something akin to jaguar spots (Rote 2019: 132). Indeed, scholars have noticed an ‘iconographic overlap’ between toads and jaguars (they feature together on the codex-style Classic Maya vase in picture 4) - the eminent Mesoamericanist Karl Taube calls the toad the ‘amphibian counterpart’ of the jaguar (1988: 342), and Kristan-Graham notes that in current Maya narratives ‘the jaguar and the toad find a messenger to ask the gods for rain’ (2023: 143).
Of course it wasn’t just the Maya who saw profound symbolism in the toad’s strong connections with both earth and water realms. The Mexica earth deity Tlaltecuhtli was sometimes portrayed as a toad with fangs and claws (Benson 2001: 421); Baquedano suggests the position of Tlaltecuhtli’s head facing skyward on the largest Mexica monolith yet discovered ‘may emulate the pose adopted by toads in the dry months, in the “dead months”, with its head facing skyward’ (2023: 163). Reflecting their remarkable attention to botanical detail in their sculptures of creatures, ‘the jade symbols on the underside of Aztec toad images [see pic 5] symbolise the toad’s seat patch, which allows it to “drink” in a puddle or spring’ (Milbrath 2023: 407). The toad’s ability to survive underground in the dry months made it a symbol of strength and resilience (Baquedano 2023: 163-4) and for Mesoamericans in general a guardian of the ‘portal between the worlds’ (Morris 1987: 108).
The toad plays an important role in the sacred Quiché Maya book Popol Vuh - one of four creatures (louse, toad, snake, falcon) to carry a (swallowed) message to the Hero Twins of their summons to the great ball court by the Lords of the Underworld. The sequence not only reflects the concept of food chain (Benson 1997: 82), but ‘the toad acts as a mediator between the underworld, the Earth and the heavens, being of the water, the land and within the belly of the falcon or hawk, also of the heavens’ (Rote 2019: 127). ‘The toad is associated with the watery underworld and the fertility of the earth’s interior as a source of renewal’ (Christenson 2003: 156).
Interestingly, the name of the toad in the Popol Vuh is Tamazul, a word derived from the Nahuatl word for toad, tamazolli, suggesting an interchange of mythological elements between Central Mexican and Maya cultures.
Sure enough, we find Nahua toponyms incorporating a toad in at least two manuscripts drawn after the Spanish invasion: the all-important Codex Mendoza (in the Bodleian Library) and the Tlaxcala territorial rights plan Mapa de Santa Barbara Tamasolco (in the British Museum) - see pic 7.
The toad continues to feature strongly in modern Maya folklore, as guardian, musician and shaman of the Earthlord’s house (often represented as a cave, traditionally a Mesoamerican entrance to the underworld); the earth and its portals were regularly depicted as quatrefoils (Morris 1987). Earthlord, toad and saint - three designs significantly all very similar in shape - have been woven into Maya textiles, largely unchanged, for generations. Yet when Maya weavers are queried on the ancestry of these symbols, until very recently the answer to ‘Why a toad?’ was simply ‘It’s custom, that’s the way it’s always been’ - weavers recognised the antiquity and value of the motifs, yet something of the meaning had been lost (Morris 1987: 116).
Spanish invaders destroyed temples, burnt books, banned the ritual ballgame, killed and enslaved vast numbers of people, but one thing they didn’t pay attention to was the symbols on Maya clothing, ceramics and stonework. They admired the beauty of Maya designs and made weavers decorate figures of saints in churches, but they didn’t understand the symbols! If they had, they might have had second thoughts...
In Europe in the Middle Ages the toad was the symbol of the devil, long considered an animal of ill omen, able to poison people and, as the ‘familiar’ of witches, thought to possess magical powers. At home both on land and in water, it could cause repugnance because of its drab, wart-like skin, its slow movements and the way it emerges from some dark hole.
The toad plays the role of witch’s familiar in Shakespeare’s Macbeth, and is described by the bard in As You Like It as ‘ugly and venomous’. The devil was believed to lurk in graveyards in the form of a toad, and the poor creatures even ended up being ‘valued instruments of torture’: Thomas of Monmouth wrote that, in the reign of Stephen (1135–54), the King’s enemies were thrown into dungeons, where they suffered ‘cold, hunger, stench and attacks of toads’ (Country Life 02/12/2017).
Ironically, by contrast, on the other side of the ocean the toad’s status has long been very different: ‘The amphibious toad remains a symbol of the fertility of the earth, and of the waters that gave it birth’ (Morris, 1987: 108).
But was it simply a powerful portent of life-giving rain? Baquedano (2023: 170-172) has pointed out that both Aztec and Maya ritual garments often bore representations of toads, in contexts linked to rain deities.
Yes, the toad meant more... In the famous set of limestone lintels from the Classic Maya city of Yaxchilan - several of them on display in the Mexico gallery of the British Museum - scholars and visitors alike are struck by the intricate weaving designs in the protagonists’ clothing carved skilfully in relief in the panels. The scenes depict the solemn ritual preparations ‘required to invoke the presence of powerful ancestral spirits, ensure success in battle and secure captives for sacrifice’ (McEwan 1994: 44). The first set - of which lintel 26 we show here - was commissioned by Lord Shield Jaguar and records the rituals commemorating his accession to the throne in 681 CE. Lintel 26 is the only one that resides today in Mexico. It shows one of Shield Jaguar’s wives, Lady Xoc, presenting him with his battle garb, including a jaguar helmet cradled in her left arm. She wears an exquisitely woven huipil. Somewhere on it a toad sits, ready to jump out at you...
Just to the right of the jaguar helmet, on Lady Xoc’s shoulder, is an ancient toad symbol. We’ve animated it to make it clearer to see...
’The toad motif is worn by the queen as an emblem of prosperity under Shield Jaguar’s reign’ (Morris 1987: 30). The toad motif is a good example of the rediscovery of meaning in ancient Maya symbols today being undertaken by Maya weaving collectives, researching their own ancestry and empowering themselves as a result (follow the link below to read of another example, the Woman symbol).
Interestingly, the Maya toad glyph contains elements that match other symbols. ‘Its curled legs resemble the pictograph for accession: the crossed legs of the king seated on the stone platform that serves as his throne’ (ibid).
More significantly, eminent scholars, including Eduard Seler, Elizabeth Benson and Karl Taube, have drawn attention to the role played by the toad as symbol/zoomorphic form of the all-important twenty-day period in the Mesoamerican calendar, known as uinal or winal. Why a toad? It’s long been known that the calendar has a base of twenty reflecting the number of digits on human beings, and the words in Yucatec Mayan for ‘twenty’ and for ‘person’ are virtually identical. Taube (1993: 168) suggests the choice of toad to represent the winal probably ‘derives from the fact that toads, like people, possess 20 digits’. But do they?! To the lay person, a toad has four digits on each ‘hand’ and five on each ‘foot’, making 18 in total.
However, herpetological specialists (that’s frog/toad experts) tell us that there ARE some species of toad that boast an apparent extra digit. Scholarly papers mention ‘pseudo-thumbs’, ‘(rudimentary) sixth digits’, ‘lost digits’, ‘additional skeletal elements’, ‘digit-like structures’, and ‘vestigial digits’... One expert, Ty Smith of Herping Virginia, for example, brought to our attention (American) Spadefoots, ‘which do range into Mexico. They... boast a large, hardened spur on the foot that is used for digging. It’s not a toe, but is toe-like enough that I could see confusion’ (personal communication).
Others refer to ‘a structure called the pre-pollex on the hands. This can appear as a substantial cartilaginous spike, employed by males in conflict. It is very variable: some species have no discernible prepollex... [its presence in some toad species suggest that] since the Mayans would not have differentiated between true toes and pre-pollices, they may well have counted the number of fingers as 2x5’ (Froglife trustee, personal communication).
So the cane toad, so often undervalued until recently in academic research, proves to be, in Carey Rote’s words, ‘a powerful force in organic farming, functioning as a deterrent to destructive pests. In addition, the cane toad produces powerful hallucinogenic substances for humans, while at the same time, repelling predators with its bitter taste, acrid smell and poison. This bufo-toxin is a powerful substance that links the toad with the Underworld origins of maize’ (2019: 123). Give me five, Mr. Toad!
Sources/references:-
• Baquedano, Elizabeth (2023) ‘Iconography and Symbolism of Frogs and Toads in the Aztec World and Beyond’, chapter 6 in Birds and Beasts of Ancient Mesoamerica eds. Susan Milbrath & Elizabeth Baquedano, University Press of Colorado
• Benson, Elizabeth (1997) Birds and Beasts of Ancient Latin America, University Press of Florida
• ------ (2001) ‘Frogs and Toads’ in The Oxford Encyclopaedia of Mesoamerican Cultures, vol. 1, ed. D. Carrasco, OUP
• ‘Common Toad’, Wikipedia entry
• Christenson, Allen J. (2003) Popol Vuh, University of Oklahoma Press
• Hellmuth, Nicholas (2011) ‘Sacred Toads’, Revue Magazine Feb 2011, pp 1-5
• Kappelman, Julia Guernsey (2004) ‘Demistifying the late preclassic Izapan-style stela-altar “cult”’, RES 45, Spring 2004, 99-122
• Kristan-Graham, Cynthia (2023) ‘An Animal Kingdom at Chicen Itzá: Reconstructing a Sculptural Tableau at the Sacred Cenote’, chapter 5 in Birds and Beasts of Ancient Mesoamerica, op cit
• Macazaga Ordoño, César (1982) Diccionario de Zoología Nahuatl, Editorial Innovación S.A., Mexico City
• McEwan, Colin (1994) Ancient Mexico in the British Museum, British Museum Press
• Milbrath, Susan (1999) Star Gods of the Maya, University of Texas Press
• ------ (2023) ‘A New World Bestiary in Postclassic Mesoamerica’, chapter 14 in Birds and Beasts of Ancient Mesoamerica op cit
• Morris, Walter F. (1987) Living Maya, Harry N. Abrams, New York
• Rote, Carey Clements (2019) ‘Guardians of the Corn: The Snake, The Bat and The Toad in Pre-Columbian Mayan Art of the Classic Period (ca. 250-900 CE)’, Journal of Literature and Art Studies, Jan 2019 vol. 9, no. 1, 123-134
• Seler, Eduard (2008) Las imágenes de animales en los manuscritos mexicanos y mayas, Casa Juan Pablos, Mexico City
• Taube, Karl (1988) ‘A Study of Classic Maya Scaffold Sacrifice’, chapter 12 in Maya Iconography, eds. E.P. Benson & G. G. Griffin, Princeton University Press
• Taube, Karl & Miller, Mary (1993) The Gods and Symbols of Ancient Mexico and the Maya, Thames & Hudson Ltd., London
Picture sources:-
• Main: Izapa Altar 2, drawing by Ramiro Jiménez Pozo, courtesy of the New World Archaeological Foundation
• Pic 1: photo (l) and (r) Izapa Stela 6, drawing by Ayax Moreno, both courtesy of the New World Archaeological Foundation
• Pic 2: image downloaded from https://www.researchgate.net/figure/K5935-toad-vessel-Some-varieties-of-toads-have-poison-sacks-containing-hallucinogenic_fig5_331229868
• Pic 3: image scanned from our own copy of the Codex Madrid, ADEVA facsimile edition, Graz, Austria, 1967
• Pic 4: photo © and courtesy Justin Kerr, mayavase.com
• Animation beside pic 4: original photo by and courtesy Jeffrey Jay Foxx; animation by Mexicolore
• Pic 5: photos by Ana Laura Landa/Mexicolore
• Pic 6: image downloaded from https://www.researchgate.net/figure/K5803-toad-emerging-out-of-the-Underworld_fig6_331229868
• Pic 7 (top) image scanned from our own copy of the James Cooper Clark facsimile edition of the Codex Mendoza (original in the Bodleian Library, Oxford), London, 1938
• Pic 7 (bottom) image downloaded from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mapa_de_Santa_Barbara_Tamasolco_(BM_Am2006,Drg.22070_1).jpg © The Trustees of the British Museum, released as CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
• Pic 8: photo © and courtesy Justin Kerr, mayavase.com
• Pic 9: image from Wikipedia (Common toad) (L); photo by and courtesy Jeffrey Jay Foxx
• Pic 10 (& animation following): original image downloaded from https://artsandculture.google.com/asset/dintel-26-unknown/RgFXswYv4fFNdA?hl=es
• Pic 12: illustration for Mexicolore by and thanks to Steve Radzi/mayavision.com; inset toad graphic by Phillip Mursell, inset glyph scanned from Dictionary of Maya Hieroglyphs by John Montgomery, Hippocrene Books, 2001, inset photo © and courtesy Justin Kerr, mayavase.com
• Pic 13: image scanned from Seler 2008 op cit
• Pic 14: photo by and courtesy of Ty Smith/Herping Virginia
• Pic 15: photo © and courtesy of Linda Pitkin/2020VISION.
Q. What do Mexicans call militant toad aficionados today?
A. ‘Sapotistas’!
The sacred toad, from an engraving on a stela at Izapa