Article suitable for older students
Find out more28th Apr 2025
Mexicolore contributor Jesper Nielsen
We’re most grateful to Jesper Nielsen - seen here (on the left) with colleague Hugo García Capistrán in the Sierra Chincua Sanctuary, Michoacán - for writing for us this important article on the place of the Monarch butterfly in Mesoamerican culture. Dr. Nielsen is an associate professor in Mesoamerican studies at the University of Copenhagen. He has published widely on Mesoamerican iconography, epigraphy, and religion, in particular Teotihuacan, the Epiclassic cultures and the relationship between the Maya and Teotihuacan. He also has a strong interest in the early colonial period and the merging of Mesoamerican religions and Catholicism, as well as the field of research history. He is currently Head of Studies at the Dept. of Cross-Cultural and Regional Studies but is also working on a biography of two pioneering women in Mexican archaeology and ethnography, Danish sisters Helga Larsen and Bodil Christensen.
In the 1970’s researchers were finally able to demonstrate where billions of monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) from vast regions of the US and Canada went, when they, each year in late summer and early fall, “suddenly” disappeared. It turned out by far that most of the characteristic black-orange and white butterflies that left their summer home set out on the longest journey performed by any insect – aiming for a relatively constricted area of forested mountains in central Mexico. Here they overwinter, at times clustering in massive groups of thousands of individuals in the branches of their favourite tree, the oyamel fir (Abies religiosa).
Such colonies are estimated to consist of up to 61 million monarchs per hectare. Today, these so-called monarch “sanctuaries” in the State of Mexico and Michoacán have become popular tourist destinations, and experiencing the thousands of small, winged beings flittering around you in the thin, clear mountain air and with the populated valleys far below you, leaves many with an unexpected sense of connectedness to insects. To many visitors, including myself, it is also a deeply moving and unforgettable experience. Knowing how closely agricultural societies follow and interpret the arrival and behaviours of specific birds and animals, life cycles of plants and meteorological phenomena, it is unthinkable that the indigenous peoples of pre-Columbian central Mexico did not in some way attribute meaning to this spectacular event.
The monarch butterflies arrive from their northern summer habitats, where they breed, around late August and into September, and like other species of butterflies have a remarkable life cycle. They go through a series of transformations: from egg to larvae, which then turns into a hard, lifeless pupa or cocoon and “dies” - only to appear as a completely different being, winged and often stunningly beautiful in its colours and patterns. Human cultures and religious traditions across the globe have seen in these remarkable transformations an attractive natural metaphor for the birth, life, death and rebirth of the human soul (or whatever term is used in specific traditions).
Scholars studying Mesoamerican cultures and religious beliefs have long known that butterflies played a similar role in many of the cultures of the central Mexican highlands, in particular among the Late Postclassic Mexica and other nahuatl-speaking groups of the central valleys, but also in the great early Classic metropolis of Teotihuacan (in the eastern parts of Mesoamerica, most notably among the Maya, there is no evidence of a similar focus on butterflies, and they are almost completely absent from iconographic and epigraphic sources), but also in indigenous cultures of more recent times.
Thus, several ethnographic studies document that butterflies are thought of as the souls of the dead returning to the world of the living. In some cases, this coincides with the Day of the Dead (Día de los Muertos), in essence a Catholic celebration but with indigenous beliefs and practices meaningfully incorporated in the centuries after the Spanish invasion. These butterflies are of different species, typically yellow and white butterflies, and not specifically the monarchs. I will return to this, since in the past few decades, the monarchs have taken on a major role in the visual repertoire of the Day of the Dead.
Let us first see what evidence we have at hand in terms of Mesoamerican beliefs pointing to a connection between butterflies and the souls of the dead. By far the most telling and often cited source is the so-called Florentine Codex, written by Bernardino de Sahagún and his indigenous co-authors in the second half of the 16th century. In Book 3 of this monumental 12-volume encyclopaedia on Mexica culture and history, we read the following about Mexica warriors that had fallen in battle. They would, after four years in the realm of the Sun God, return to the human realm in new shapes:-
“And when they had passed four years there, then they changed into precious birds - hummingbirds, orioles, yellow birds, yellow birds blackened about their eyes, chalky butterflies, feather down butterflies, gourd bowl butterflies; they suckled honey there where they dwelt. And here upon earth they came to suck from all the various flowers” (Sahagún 1978: 49)
It becomes apparent that it was mainly the souls of deceased warriors who earned this especially honoured access to an afterlife reborn as birds and butterflies. Obviously, sucking nectar with pointy beaks and mouth tubes or proboscises here serves as elegant metaphors for weapons, blood-letting objects and the life-giving blood that was so central in Mexica ethos and cosmology. We should recall that Sahagún recorded a narrative and point of view solely provided by elite members of colonial Mexica society.
The surviving tradition of associating butterflies with ancestors suggest that identical notions existed among a much broader span of society in pre-invasion central Mexico. Butterfly-warrior imagery can also be traced back to Early Postclassic and Epiclassic cultures, again with clear indications of a symbolic relationship between warriors and butterflies. We see this, for example, at Tula, Cacaxtla, Teotenango and Xochicalco.
It is, however, at the great imperial capital of Teotihuacan, in the period from about 100 B.C. to A.D. 600., that we find the most impressive amount of butterfly imagery – and in contexts that strongly suggest that the association between butterflies and dead warriors had its origins (or first massive cultural representation) here. As have been shown in seminal contributions by Janet Berlo (1983), Karl Taube (2000, 2006), and Annabeth Headrick (2003, 2007) there is evidence of a shared ideology and continuity in these beliefs and related practices for more than 1500 years. At Teotihuacan, where none of the surviving written texts seem to record any reference to butterflies, there is a great corpus of representations of butterflies: painted on murals, drawn upon or incised in ceramic vessels, and - not least - molded in clay and placed on incense burners.
In the latter case, such adornos, as they are referred to surround a human face, which is interpreted as the portrait of a deceased warrior. Other adornos show darts and shields, as well as flowers and fruits, making the deceased warriors literally emerging into or from a place of abundance, and as such an ideal habitat for both birds and butterflies – and the souls of dead warriors. Presumably, incense was burned as part of commemorative rituals, and Taube also suggested that: “The souls of Teotihuacan warriors were transformed into butterflies during rites of cremation. In fact, [the] burning of the warrior bundle symbolized the metamorphosis from the moribund chrysalis to the brilliant butterfly” (Taube 2006: 154).
The incense burners and the burning of copal would mimic such bundles and transformations, and while the weapon-adorno underscores the deceased’s identity and status as warrior, the butterfly and flower adornos point to the transformation and future rebirth.
There is no clear indication that the butterflies depicted at Teotihuacan were intended to represent specific species, for example monarchs. Rather, they seem to be generic butterflies with all the cultural connotations they would have carried. There is, however, one broken tripod vessel which shows a swarm of butterflies, and although this could simply show a single butterfly motif repeated multiple ways – it could in fact also represent one feature that is so highly characteristic of the monarchs, namely their arrival in large swarms.
So, let us return once more to the monarchs and what so strikingly sets them apart from all other kinds of butterflies, namely their yearly migration of 4,800 km or more. It was Janet Berlo who first hypothesized, that the yearly return of the monarchs was at the heart of the central Mexican belief that the souls of the dead would return to the human world with specific time intervals (Berlo 1984: 65). What is worth stressing, apart from the fact that the natural environment and phenomena have shaped a considerable part of the religious belief systems in Mesoamerica, is that death was generally associated with the northern direction. In other words, winged souls returned from the lands of the dead – and would eventually travel back there as the end of dry season was approaching.
Finally, turning towards the present and the remarkable “return” of monarch butterflies as cultural signifiers in Mexico, they are now an integrated part of the visual display of the Day of the Dead. This is particularly the case in the commercialized expressions and products encountered in the bigger cities (e.g., Mexico City, Morelia, Oaxaca etc.) that also attracts ever huger crowds of tourists during the celebrations. It seems, however, that monarchs made their modern re-appearance as directly related to the Day of the Dead in children’s books in the mid-2000’s (for example, Janice Levy’s {itaIicI Remember Abuelito – A Day of the Dead Story / Yo recuerdo a abuelito: un cuento del Día de los Muertos from 2007).
Soon after, they were also integrated more broadly into the increasingly popular Day of the Dead festival that has become one of the most famous cultural expressions of Mexico (and was inscribed on UNESCO’s list of intangible cultural heritage in 2008). The emotional attraction of the monarch butterfly “narrative” is evident: the soothing thought of lost-ones returning for a yearly visit in the shape of something as poetic and beautiful as a butterfly.
Incidentally, the dominant colors of the monarch, black and orange, mirror the color scheme of Halloween, which not only takes place on the very same days as the Day of the Dead, but has also become more and more widespread in Mexico as cultural imports from the US reach Mexico – partly as the result of Mexican immigrant communities. In fact, Mexican immigrants have recently begun identifying themselves with the monarchs – moving freely across borders, and hundreds of towns and cities in the US have been declared “sanctuary cities”, including Los Angeles. meaning that local authorities work to support immigrant communities, regardless of federal policies. Finally, as monarch butterfly sanctuaries in Mexico are sadly threatened by illegal logging, their guardians being assassinated, the monarch is also emerging as a symbol of resistance against drug cartel power, corruption and a failed state system.
As such, the monarch butterflies, due to their exceptional life cycle transformations, extraordinary migration pattern, their paradoxical strength and vulnerability, as well as their beauty continue to capture our imagination, have even taken on new meanings in modern 21st century Mexican and global culture. In all likelihood, the long history of human cultures mirroring themselves in the monarchs, employing their yearly departure and returning as powerful metaphors for death and rebirth, began thousands of years ago among the indigenous cultures of central Mexico, and found its first great visual expression in Teotihuacan.
Suggested guide to further reading:-
• Berlo, Janet C. 1983. The Warrior and the Butterfly: Central Mexican Ideologies of Sacred Warfare and Teotihuacan Iconography. In Text and Image in Pre-Columbian Art: Essays on the Interrelationship of the Verbal and Visual Arts, ed. by Janet C. Berlo, pp. 79-177. BAR, Oxford
• ------ 1984. Teotihuacan Art Abroad: A Study of Metropolitan Style and Provincial Transformation in Incensario Workshops, 2 vols. BAR, Oxford
• Headrick, Annabeth. 2003. Butterfly War at Teotihuacan. In Ancient Mesoamerican Warfare, ed. by M. Kathryn Brown and Travis W. Stanton, pp. 149-170. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek
• ------ 2007. The Teotihuacan Trinity: The Sociopolitical Structure of an Ancient Mesoamerican City. University of Texas Press, Austin
• Nielsen, Jesper. 2016. The Cave and the Butterfly: Thoughts on Death and Rebirth in Ancient Mesoamerica. Contributions in New World Archaeology, Vol. 10: 101-111. Kraków
• Nielsen, Jesper and Christophe Helmke. 2018. ‘Where the sun came into being’: Rites of Pyrolatry, Transition and Transformation in Early Classic Teotihuacan. In Smoke, Flames, and the Human Body in Mesoamerican Ritual Practice, ed. by Vera Tiesler and Andrew K. Scherer, pp. 77-107. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington, D.C.
• Sahagún, Bernardino de. 1978. The Florentine Codex: General History of the Things of New Spain. Book 3, The Origins of the Gods. Translated by Arthur J.O. Anderson and Charles E. Dibble. University of Utah, Salt Lake City and School of American Research, Santa Fe
• Taube, Karl. 2000. The Turquoise Hearth: Fire, Self-Sacrifice, and the Central Mexican Cult of War. In Mesoamerica’s Classic Heritage: From Teotihuacan to the Aztecs, ed. by Davíd Carrasco, Lindsay Jones and Scott Sessions, pp. 269-340. University Press of Colorado, Boulder
• ------ 2006. Climbing Flower Mountain: Concepts of Resurrection and the Afterlife at Teotihuacan. Arqueología e historia del centro de México: Homenaje a Eduardo Matos Moctezuma, ed. by Leonardo López Luján, Davíd Carrasco and Lourdes Cué, pp. 153-170. INAH, Mexico, D.F.
Picture sources:-
• Main, and pix 12, 13, 15 (bottom) & 17: photos by and courtesy the author
• Pic 1: photo by hspauldi, downloaded from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Abies_religiosa_El_Rosario_5.jpg
• Pic 2: photo downloaded from https://www.worldwildlife.org/stories/eastern-monarch-butterfly-population-nearly-doubles-in-2025
• Pic 3: image by Cyanocorax, downloaded from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Butterfly_life_cycle_diagram_in_English.svg
• Pic 4: image scanned from Designs and Devices of Ancient Mexico (original in Spanish, Sellos del Antiguo México, by Jorge Enciso, Mexico City, 1947
• Pic 5: image scanned from our own copy of the Codex Borbonicus, ADEVA facsimile edition, Graz, Austria, 1974
• Pic 6: image scanned from our own copy of the Club Internacional del Libro 3-volume facsimile edition of the Florentine Codex, Madrid, 1994
• Pic 7: photo by Ian Mursell/Mexicolore
• Pic 8: image scanned from our own copy of Primeros Memoriales by Fray Bernardino de Sahagún, Facsimile Edition, University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, Oklahoma, 1993
• Pic 9: photo © 2014 Rubén G. Mendoza, downloaded from https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Teotihuacan-brazier-consisting-of-molded-applique-butterfly-motifs-affixed-to-the_fig3_312663369
• Pic 10: photo downloaded from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Censer_of_Fire_God_Quetzalpapalotl_LACMA_M.80.197.1_%282_of_4%29.jpg
• Pic 11: drawing by, thanks to and courtesy of Christophe Helmke
• Pic 14: source unknown
• Pic 15 (top): photo by Steve Corey, downloaded from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:String_of_Monarchs,_Pismo_Preserve.jpg
• Pic 16: photo © Trustees of the British Museum (AOA Am 1892,0618.7)
• Pic 18: photo downloaded from https://mexicocity.cdmx.gob.mx/muertos-events-guide-2023/
Mexicolore contributor Jesper Nielsen