Mexicolore logoMexicolore name

Article suitable for older students

Find out more

¡Xicágo!

26th Aug 2024

¡Xicágo!

Promotion for the World’s Columbian Exposition, Chicago, 1893

This is Chapter 6 of our special project. Mexico was to play a strong role at the World’s Columbian Exposition in 1893. In fact, a Mexican physician, Dr. Carlos W. Zaremba, was one of the earliest proponents of the world’s fair and proposed that Mexico City host the event. Chicago won. Mexican Day was 15th September 1893, coinciding with Mexico’s Independence celebrations. At WCE Mexico won 1,195 awards and the country’s presence ‘was especially notable for its ethnographic views. In the department of ethnology, numerous Mexican antiquities were exhibited…’ (Tenorio-Trillo, 1996: 185). (Compiled by Ian Mursell/Mexicolore)

Two years earlier, in 1891, the new University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology had opened – Stewart Culin was the director. Daniel Brinton, Professor of American Archaeology and Linguistics, chaired the department’s Americas Section between 1892-84 and ‘quickly established a [free] public lecture series… to be delivered either at the Museum or elsewhere as may appear most favourable for interesting the public in the Museum’ (Baker 2000).
Brinton’s role in promoting public education should not be underestimated. In 1884 he had moved to the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia (ANSP) – where he set up a successful public lecture series, launched in 1892 (Columbus Day), illustrative of the objects in the American section of the University Museum. He promoted ‘Indian Appreciation’ lectures. ‘Brinton spoke in romantic terms about Native Americans and the unity of races’ (Baker 2000: 400). He was ‘a purveyor of science to the Philadelphia public’ (ibid: 402). ‘Unlike Brinton’s all-male audience at the American Philosophical Society, his audiences at the Academy were virtually all female. Most of his lectures were free and open to the public… His constituents were Philadelphia society ladies. He was often supportive of women who wanted to pursue science, not as an avocation, but as a career’ (ibid: 403).

Daniel Brinton ‘reigned as the dominant Philadelphian in all fields of anthropology’ (Hinsley & Wilcox 2016: xxiv). At WCE he presided over – and delivered the keynote speech at - the International Congress of Anthropology (Aug 18 – Sept 2). During the five days of the Congress, mornings were for papers and discussions, and afternoons ‘reserved for visiting the anthropological exhibits in the Government Building, the Anthropological Building, the Midway and elsewhere’ (Hinsley, 2016: 99).
Whilst they had their disagreements, in the final evenings of the Congress and in the following week Frank Cushing and Stewart Culin frequently dined with Brinton (ibid: 108). They shared a mission, that of ‘bringing anthropology to the public by attracting them to vivid displays or entertaining lectures’ (McVicker, 2016: 384).
According to David Wilcox, the Congress attracted ‘more than forty practising anthropologists and more than two hundred others interested in cultivating the garden of their knowledge about anthropology. Unknown thousands saw the exhibits, and many of them, we may judge, went home eager to learn more about American anthropology. A national audience was born’ (2016: 446).

As we outlined in Chapter 3, from May-October 1893 Culin’s games exhibit included Zelia Nuttall’s own private (‘Central American’) game collection, the charts of her reconstruction of the ‘ancient Mexican calendar system’ – and her illustration of Patolli from the Codex Magliabechiano. But there was more. Whilst no comprehensive list exists of all the games Culin exhibited, we know they included ‘paper’ game boards and diagrams from Mexico, and a paper Goose Game (‘Juego de la oca’) from Mexico - probably similar to the one in Picture 3. Amongst the several hundred games curated by Culin in the Penn Museum’s collections today there are a number from ‘Old Mexico’, including several game pieces from the American Philosophical Society, as well as wooden game accessories donated by the explorer Carl Lumholtz; and all displayed ‘in an evolutionary perspective, showing the connections between religion, divination, and games of play’ (Pezzati, n.d.).

What made the WCE and other international fairs so special? They ‘provided an opportunity to share information, survey others… and exchange material culture. In an era without electronic media, they were the Internet of their day, an impressive form of mass communication not only for the actual visitors but also for the millions more who read about the exhibits in newspapers and magazines’ (Krasniewicz 2015: 8, emphasis added). They inspired ‘generations of entrepreneurs, artists, inventors, writers, scientists, designers, architects and everyday citizens’ (ibid, p13; emphasis added). With its special attention on the history of the Western hemisphere the Chicago Fair would become what the Smithsonian George Brown Goode called an ‘illustrated encyclopaedia of humanity’ (Wilcox, 2016: xviii). Involving three years of planning, WCE lasted six months, recorded 27.5 million visits (the total US population at the time was 65m), occupied over 1m square metres and filled over 200 buildings. On its best day it drew over 700,000 visitors (Larson 2003: 17). Two weeks was considered the minimum needed to cover it adequately (ibid: 300).

‘World exhibitions were the new media of the nineteenth century. They aroused high expectations, in much the same way as the arrival of the internet at the end of the twentieth century. These highly modern, spectacular events attracted huge crowds of visitors from every walk of life, for the first time in history’ (Hinsley & Wilcox 2016: 57). And the WCE was HUGE! ‘A single exhibit hall had enough interior volume to have housed the U.S. Capitol, the Great Pyramid, Winchester Cathedral, Madison Square Garden and St. Paul’s Cathedral, all at the same time’ (Larson 2003: 17). By 1893 Chicago’s population had topped 1m for the first time; during WCE 1,000 trains a day entered or left Chicago. Many brought single young women who… ‘sought work as typewriters, stenographers, seamstresses and weavers’ (ibid: 231). The Fair boasted over 3,000 toilets! (Wilcox 2016: 127). Its cost was estimated at some $10 million (Popular Science Monthly, March 1893).

It was by all accounts ‘an intensely visual experience’ (Hinsley & Wilcox 2016: xxxix) - aided by the fact that ‘almost every subject was illustrated with multiple media and experienced through alternate sensory modes…’ (Jacknis 2016: 273). The late 19th century was a time of massive technological advances, and the Fair ‘coincided with the introduction of several critical modern recording media: half-tone reproduction of photographs, the phonograph, and film’ (ibid: 262). The Fair alone consumed three times as much electricity as the entire city of Chicago (Larson 2003: 286), allowing electricity to light up the night sky on a scale never witnessed before.
Mass media had a field day promoting the Fair. ‘The exposition was widely disseminated in both words and images in a virtual mountain of books, magazines and newspapers’ (Jacknis 2016: 323), plus guidebooks and photo albums later. The general trend at world fairs everywhere was that guides ‘were published and sold even before a fair opened’ (Farrington 2015: 49); to give one example, Martin’s World’s Fair Album-Atlas and Family Souvenir of WCE went on sale in 1892... Perhaps he was hardly exaggerating when Director of Works at WCE Daniel Burnham told the event’s sponsors that it was ‘the third greatest event in American history after the Revolution and the Civil War’ (Wilcox 2016: 127).

And it wasn’t just mainstream popular attractions that caught the eye of the press. The Chicago Sunday Herald (Sept 17th 1893) ran a major piece on anthropology at the Fair, and on the Anthropological Building in particular, and the Chicago Daily Tribune (July 2nd. 1893) spoke of the ‘Wonders of the Ethnological Building’s Sections’, including a lengthy paragraph on Stewart Culin’s ‘Exhibit of Folk Lore’ (picture 7). ‘For those who only heard or read of the Fair from a distance, published images – photographs, paintings, engravings and newspaper line drawings, cartoons – raised suggestive questions about human global variety and relations’ (Hinsley 2016: 239).
A massive outpouring of media coverage, including a ‘bewildering variety of souvenir photo albums and Fair histories’ bombarded the general American public. ‘In this process, from 1891 through 1894 publicists of the Fair constructed a coherent, watertight narrative, running from anticipation through nostalgia and embedding the White City [Chicago] in local and national remembrance’ (Hinsley & Wilcox 2016: 48-9). A general consensus arose amongst US novelists at the time that the WCE would prove to be an ‘unprecedented educational opportunity’ for visitors, a kind of ‘real and broad university’ (ibid 68).

Intriguingly, the Anthropological Building wasn’t actually completed until July 4th, by which time the Fair was already a third over. However, July 4 proved to be one of the most crowded days of the Fair: with over 25,000 visitors to the new building alone (ibid: 24). The Maya facades outside received wide popular attention (ibid: 48): whilst the aim was to ‘transform [English explorer Frederick] Catherwood’s romantic engravings [of ancient Maya ruins] into a living tableau’, in practice ‘[lead WCE curator] Putnam had created a panoramic theme ride for the armchair explorer – the archaeological equivalent of the exposition’s newly invented Ferris Wheel’ (Tripp Evans 2004: 156).

‘Acting as a historical foil to the Palace [of Fine Arts]’s exhibits, the Anthropology Building’s collections of ancient Mesoamerican casts and other artifacts constituted the continent’s pre-European artistic legacy. Situated at opposite ends of the fair’s elevated railway (picture 9), these structures formed the two poles of cultural achievement in the New World; in travelling from one end of the railway to the other, visitors to the exposition figuratively moved through the progressive stages of American civilisation’ (ibid: 158).
In short, you had to go! In the words of leading philosopher of the day William James ‘Everyone says one ought to sell all one has and mortgage one’s soul to go [to the WCE] there; it is esteemed such a revelation of beauty. People cast away all sin and baseness, burst into tears and grow religious, etc., under the influence!’’ (Hinsley & Wilcox 2016: 11). What’s more, ‘the Fair was enormously popular. It seems like almost every American visited it, on multiple occasions.’ (Ira Jacknis, email 1/9/19).
At this point we need to (re-)introduce the ‘star of the whole show’, the inventor of The Landlord’s Game, that was turned into Monopoly, Lizzie Magie.

Elizabeth ‘Lizzie’ Magie was born on May 9th 1866 (McFarland 1991) in the small town of Macomb, western Illinois (founded in 1830). ‘The family was solidly middle-class’ (Pilon 2015: 24). In 1861 her father James Magie moved to Macomb ‘where he assumed editorial control of the Macomb Journal, eventually becoming its sole owner’. He also became Postmaster (Pilon, 2015: 23). By 1880 the Magie household in Illinois consisted of her dad (J K Magie, printer & editor), mum (Mary), brother (Edward, printer & stenographer, aged 24), Lizzie (printer, aged 14) and mother-in-law Mary (1880 Census - picture 10). Clearly from a young age Lizzie was already not only exposed to but working in the news industry. According to Lizzie’s own journal of the early 1940s (about which more in the final chapter), at just this time the family moved to Chicago, renting 7 rooms over a store at 939 W. Madison (McFarland 1991). On the ground floor was James’s printing and editorial business. In the Chicago Directories for 1881 and 1882 Lizzie and her brother Edward are listed as stenographers – trained to transcribe and type court proceedings (you have to listen very carefully and type very fast to be one).

It seems Magie didn’t attend School or College, and her highest grade completed was 4th year in High School (1940 Census). Her father had discovered corruption in the state printing business, refused to join the ‘ring’ and ‘the ring eventually drove him from Springfield’. In her own words: ‘At the age of 12, I was obliged to leave school and go to work. I worked as a compositor for a year and meanwhile learned stenography and went to Chicago. I wanted to study literature but as the support of others had devolved upon my shoulders, I was never able to do so’ (Macomb Daily Journal, Oct 17, 1908 - picture 11).
By now she had attended a convention of stenographers with her father, and was already concerned with working conditions in the profession. She found work as a typist in the Dead Letter Office of the U.S. Post Office in Washington; by 1893 this busy department was handling some 20,000 items every day. In early January 1893 - significantly, the year of the WCE - aged 26, Lizzie went to the US Patent Office to patent ‘a gadget that allowed paper to pass through typewriter rollers with more ease’. Her father went too and to witness the act; he had himself invented and patented one or two devices, such as a combination lock (Pilon 2015: 28). Sadly he died just days later.

Over these years James was educating Lizzie to be a radical free-thinker. ‘It was a young girl’s deep love for her father and unconsolable grief at his death that indirectly kindled the spark of inspiration for devising complicated games and then simplifying them for other people’s entertainment… Sometime before his death he handed the book by Henry George, “Progress and Poverty”, to his daughter and urged her to read it… after his death she took it up and studied it thoroughly, feeling that she owed at least that to her father. She became so interested in the division of income among land, labour and capital that she struggled for several years trying to work out a scheme for a just and proportionate division’ (Troxell 1911). Henry George’s Progress and Poverty was a best-seller for many years, trailing only the Bible, and Mark Twain’s most popular works’ (Orbanes 2006: 6). His funeral attracted 100,000 mourners (ibid: 7).

‘Lizzie travelled in highly political circles. She served as the secretary of the Women’s Single Tax Club in Washington, and counted Henry George Junior, the like-minded son of her single tax idol, as one of her friends’ (Pilon 2015: 26). She taught evening classes on Henry George’s single tax theory (ibid: 30). In fact she remained faithful to the theory all her life, continuing to hold Henry George School of Social Science classes in her home decades later (The Evening Star, Washington DC 28 Jan 1936).
She was talented and experienced in different fields. After work, she wrote poetry and short stories and performed on stage in local Washington theatres (Pilon 2015: 27). Late in 1892 she self-published a book of her poems ‘My Betrothed’, and printed 500 copies (picture 13) (ibid). Three years later she published a short story ‘For the Benefit of the Poor’, in Frank Leslie’s Popular Monthly, a popular journal (ibid: 29). She also published in Godey’s, a woman’s magazine based in Philadelphia (ibid). But by now she was striving to find new and creative ways to communicate progressive ideas… In particular, she wanted to educate fellow citizens on how to look after the earth. Her message: ‘share the planet’. The focus was on sharing the earth’s resources and on learning from ancient cultures (McFarland, ‘phone conversation, 1/9/07).

The WCE would prove the ideal (and massive) milieu in which Lizzie would have been able to find inspiration and to learn from other cultures. Apart from the International Congress of Anthropology, the third World’s Folklore Congress took place at WCE in July 1893. The Fair abounded with folklore exhibits, as we outlined in Chapter 5 on Stewart Colin.
Significantly, the last decade of the century saw a rise in popularity of board games ‘not just as a pastime but also a means of communication’ (Pilon, 2015: 30). Might an innovative new board game serve her purpose?
Let’s summarise where she stood in 1893. Apart from her interest in folklore and ancient world cultures, we have:-
• Stenographer
• Worked as a typist in the Dead Letter Office
• Inventor, interest in patents
• Poet/story writer/actress
• Feminist/Radical
• Follower of Georgism.

ALL of these interests would be served by her attending the WCE in Chicago! Can we be certain she attended? No, but in my view the probability that she attended is singularly high - a view shared by Distinguished Professor Emeritus at Western Illinois University and local historian, John E. Hallwas (personal communication, 2019).
Let’s go through the bullet points above one by one.

Stenographer. This was a heyday for the profession. With the mechanisation of communication stenography moved quickly into the spotlight, with reports of a ‘surge in demand’ in the 1880s and 1890s for independent typing and stenographic contractors (Stole, 2010: 174). By 1890 the number of female stenographers and typewriters multiplied nearly ten times to 63% of the total (from 4.5% in 1870), and nationally the number of women in clerical jobs rose by a factor of eight from 1880-1900 (ibid: 65). ‘Women poured into shorthand and typing positions during the last few decades of the century... proving their competence in a new feminine ideal, the turn-of-the-twentieth-century New Woman’ (ibid: 12).

Unionisation increased, and professional associations flourished in ‘80s and ‘90s. The Chicago Stenographers’ Association had 307 members (ibid: 198); one member saw it as ‘a family together like a home’ (ibid: 217), and with professionalism came respectability and ambition, as women ‘appeared as agents of their own destiny’ (ibid: 162). They were encouraged in this by popular shorthand magazines, all of which boasted a wide range of readers, publicised professional meetings and debates, gave employment tips, adverts for home-study materials, practise exercises etc. To give just two examples – Philadelphia Stenographer and Phonographic World ‘billed stenography as an opportunity for women, like men, to achieve upward mobility’ (ibid: 9).
What’s more, Chicago was the place to be…
At the 1881 International Convention of Shorthand Writers of the USA and Canada in Chicago a toast was given to ‘The Center of the Shorthand World, Chicago’ (Proceedings 1: 69). Registered members in attendance included Miss Lizzie Magie and E.R. Magie. Both attended the 1st Annual International Congress of Shorthand Writers in Ohio the following year (Proceedings 2: 107).
Would Lizzie not have attended Stenographers’ Day at WCE, July 22nd. 1893? The closing reception, organised by the National Association of Woman Stenographers in the Woman’s Building, was attended by ‘about a thousand stenographers, from all parts of the country’.

Typist/Dead Letter Office/Post Office
Fifteen of the Columbian stamps were released for sale at the start of the new year in 1893, and the Post Office Department mounted a prominent display of the commemorative stamps later that year in an exhibit inside the United States Government Building on the fairgrounds of the World’s Fair. Surely Lizzie would have felt duty-bound to visit?

Inventor
‘World’s fairs inspired generations of entrepreneurs, artists, inventors, writers, scientists, designers, architects, and everyday citizens’ (Krasniewicz 2015: 13). Several displays were ‘devoted to women inventors and artists’ (Rydell 1993: 156). The Patent Office had a stand in the Government Building. Would Lizzie not have attended the Congress of Patents and Trade-Marks, at WCE, October 2-7 1893?

Poet/author/actress
Highlight of Poets Day, WCE, August 30th. 1893, was a performance of Shakespeare’s comedy ‘As You Like It’. Wouldn’t Lizzie have loved it?

Feminist
The Woman’s Building (picture 18), built to highlight woman’s achievements with examples from all over the world, was used as ‘a gathering place for women at the fair’ (Rydell 1993: 151). A female architect, Sophia Hayden of Boston, 21 years old, had won the contest to design it (Larson 2003: 140); it was planned, designed and decorated entirely by women. Its library contained over 7,000 books. Lizzie would have found the Building a feminist haven; ‘the fact that woman has been the chief actor in originating and developing every peaceful art is impressively shown’ (Starr 1893: 618).

Follower of Georgism
Henry George began writing Progress and Poverty in September 1877, finishing it in March 1879 (Young, 1916: 65). It was republished as a serial, beginning in October 1881, in Truth, a one-cent workingman’s daily of New York, with a circulation of 75,000-100,000 (ibid: 83). By 1884 the New York Independent noted that sales of the book were ‘numbered by the hundred thousand, the readers by the million’ (ibid: 88). The book was discussed by workmen on factory floors all over the country and enjoyed ‘a larger sale than any book written by any American writer’ Public Opinion 1886 (ibid: 97). Significantly, the word ‘civilisation’ peppers the book. George had travelled round the world 1½ times as a young seaman, and grew convinced that ‘every previous civilisation has been destroyed by the unequal distribution of wealth and power’ (George, 2006: 287).

The very word ‘civilisation’ George associated with ‘cooperation’ (2006: 284). Societal development he found universally to be the antithesis of cooperation - exploitation and inequality. ‘As the population increases, land, and hardly anything else but land, becomes valuable… Land ownership leaves its tax upon all the productive classes. What is the remedy? To make land-owners bear the common burdens – tax land and exempt everything else’ (ibid: 56).
Land policy in the US had historically led to ‘confiscation, and that not in the real interests of the United States, or of any American settlers, but of speculating land sharpers’ (ibid: 34); in California the policy encouraged (US) settlers to squat lands that belonged to a few hundred Mexican grantees (resulting from the US-Mexico Treaty and the US acquisition of California in 1848). The conditions led to California’s ‘land monopoly’ – concentration of land ownership. The population of California rose dramatically from 20,500 in 1848 to 864,694 in 1880. This led to a huge increase in the value of land, with the greatest fortunes being made by holders of real estate.

Comments (0)