Article suitable for older students
Find out more14th Jul 2022
Mexicolore contributor George Fery
We are most grateful to George Fery, a freelance writer-photographer of pre-Columbian history and archaeological sites of Mexico and the Americas, for writing this illuminating summary of the long-drawn out - and little known - saga of the Maya struggle to resist the invading Spaniards, a story that actually spans centuries...
The subjugation of the Aztecs by the Spanish conquistador or conqueror, Hernan Cortez, took two years with the support of thousands of Tlaxcala and Otomi Indians allies. The conquest of Mexico’s Yucatán peninsula, however, spanned 125 of the 374 years history of a long and strenuous coexistence. In defiance of defeat upon defeat on the battlefields of the peninsula and beyond, the natives fiercely resisted the foreign foe. Among numerous clashes, Chamberlain states that Aké (1528), was “the epic battle that became by tradition one of the most renowned engagements in the long and bloody conquest of Yucatán” (1). Because it was the first decisive armed confrontation between the Spanish and the indigenous people. Aké, however, was only the beginning of a struggle that will only wane on the doorsteps of the twentieth century.
It all started with the first Spanish entrada or incursion, 1527-1529, that began from the east with Francisco de Montejo (the Elder). The hot and humid climate was hard on the Spaniards, notably during battles, so they adopted indigenous body protection for close combat, for armor was too hot and cumbersome. They used long thick tunics quilted with cotton, they called escuipiles, which protected them to the knees. Footmen, crossbowmen and arquebusiers were likewise protected from head to toe as were horses with quilted armor. Past actions taught the Spaniards the Maya’s tactical plans and they knew that, more than the Spanish weapons, they were terrified of the horses and worse still, of the fierce dogs of war that ripped them apart.
Let us briefly read from Montejo’s notes recorded by the chronicler Cárdenas y Valencia (1937:15-16). “…at Aké, the Indians appeared in large numbers…blowing big conch-shells to rally warriors that, together with screams of rage from hundreds of throats magnified the deafening noise; they all had weapons they use in war such as bows and quivers of arrows, stone throwers, poles with their tips hardened by fire, lances with points of sharp flints, two-handed swords of very strong wood inset with obsidian blades, large conch-shells of the sea; naked except for the shameful parts which were covered with a cloth; daubed with earth of colors, they appeared as most ferocious devils” Even though many Maya were killed and wounded during the fight, many more came in to fill the gaps and kept fighting, not allowing the Spaniards any respite.
The casualties were important for the Spaniards, with twenty-three men dead or wounded, and three horses killed or maimed, as were dogs. The losses, however, were horrendous for the Maya, with over 1,200 dead warriors, including local village chiefs. Aké was the turning point of this first entrada or incursion and showed the Mayas, the resolve and military prowess of a dangerous foe. The emotional impact of the disaster was devastating to the locals. Not only did the surviving chastened lords of Aké hasten to pledge their allegiance, but as the Spaniards victory came to be known throughout the region, many headmen sent delegates to Montejo seeking peace and friendship. The battle, however, gave the Spaniards a taste of the implacable antagonism that would simmer long into the future. In that future, the spirit of Aké will be kept alive through ceaseless strife.
The second incursion took place from the west, headed by Montejo’s son, also known as Francisco de Montejo (the Younger), from 1529 to 1535, when he barely escaped the wrath of the Mayas from his base at Chichèn Itzá. Of note is that, unlike Aztec centralized power, the notable characteristic of the Maya Early Classic period (250-550AD), saw the emergence of independent states across much of the peninsula. Sharer and Textler point out that “documentary evidence of the Early Classic era is sporadic in the north. No single major center dominated the political and economic arena of the period, but several chiefdoms’ states developed such as Aké, Acanceh, Izamal and Oxtintok” (2006). The major cacicazgos or chiefdoms were those of Cochuah and Ekab, while those yielding the most political power were the Tutul Xiu of Mani and the Nachi Cocom of Sotuta. Both political powerhouses played major roles during the conquest. The Tutul Xiu promptly allied with the Spanish and kept their friendly disposition throughout the invasion as a counterpoint, no doubt, to their enduring antagonism with the hated Nachi Cocom.
At first, the Spaniards were reluctantly welcomed, but within a few years, the Mayas’ hostility increased as the result of abuse by encomenderos, conquistadors who were granted land and people for their services to the crown, and the forced conversion to the Catholic faith. Unlike in central Mexico with the Aztecs, however, the peninsula of Yucatán was then ruled by seventeen chiefdoms. Among several confrontations, Diego Lopez de Cogolludo (1688) explains what happened to the besieged Spaniards at Chichén Itzá, they called Ciudad Real, in 1532. The Spaniards were cornered for months by the Mayas in the ancient city and lost 150 men in hopeless counter attacks. “The situation was dire and getting worse, Montejo and his men were trapped. They had to move out or die in Ciudad Real.”
The Indians, however, had a flaw in their fighting order as found at Aké and other battles, they did not fight in the dark of night. The Spaniards, aware of that precept, had to leave at night but they needed to keep the Indians believing that they were still in the compound at sunrise. So, they had a dog tied up with a rope linked to a bell, with food and water several feet away, out of reach. Through the night, the Indians heard the bell they associated with Christian rituals and the dog barking. In the dead of night, the Spaniards abandoned Ciudad Real and headed for the coast about seventy miles away, their only salvation route. Early in the morning the Indians realized the ploy and small groups of warriors ran after the fugitives. Short lived battles broke the indigenous scouts’ attempt at stopping the Spanish. Exhausted, Montejo with the remnants of his party, safely reached the port of Dzilam.
Antagonism toward the Europeans was never far from outright hostility. The Great Maya Revolt of 1546-1547 was started by Cupul priests inspired by ancestral divinities and was led by the exalted priest Chilam Anbal. He set the date for the Great Uprising on the full moon of the night 8-9 November 1546, corresponding to 5-Cimi (death) and 9-Kan (sacrifice) in the ritual Yucatec calendar. Few cities such as Valladolid were barely able to resist the cries of hate and rage. Chamberlain reports that “at the appointed time the Mayas of the eastern provinces rose in sudden and overwhelming fury. The carnage and unspeakable cruelty knew no bounds and killed Spaniards of all ages in large numbers together with over 600 naborias, Maya converts to Catholicism. The heads, hands and feet of Spaniards were cut and sent throughout the land to incite others to greater fury and ruthless carnage” (1947) (1).
Most cities were on the brink of collapse when Montejo (the Younger), and his captains from Mérida and Campeche regained control of the provinces emptied of Europeans and creoles, albeit through years of conflict interspaced with periods of precarious peace. The burden of occupation was far worse for the Mayas, however, since they had to endure untold hardships from their new masters, who were dedicated to bend them to a new faith and way of life. In 1567, another Maya prophet, the Chilam Cuoh, preached the supremacy of the ancient ways and prophesied a war of religion around the Spanish town of Bacalar (Quintana Roo). The Chilam was captured in 1569 and sent under armed guard to bishop Fray Francisco de Toral in Mérida, for exemplary punishment. It will take another nineteen years of brutal and bloody conflicts for the indigenous people to be somewhat pacified. Hostility and defiance at all times simmered close to the surface.
Farris notes that “Maya culture, in common with that of other peoples of New Spain, Colombia and Peru, was too ancient, too deeply grounded and too tenaciously conservative to be easily swept to one side” (2). The relentless antagonism of the Mayas rested on being marginalized as a group. In Spanish colonial times, the Yucatán and most of New Spain, was set under a legal caste scheme where peninsulares (those born in Spain), were at the top of the social system, then the criollos born in the colonies but of Spanish lineage. At the next level, were the mestizos, or creoles of European and indigenous descent; followed by the descendants of the natives who had collaborated with the Spaniards during the conquest. At the bottom of the social system were the “others”, the indios.
Through history, the Mayas showed a tenacious resistance to Toltec and Spanish invaders. They overcame the epidemic of smallpox of 1514. The uprising of Bacalar (1639-1641) was followed by the one of 1668-1671 and the rebellion of Jacinto Canek in 1761. The colonial socio-economic system was, among others, the root cause of ceaseless upheavals. The Caste War (1862-1901) was the ultimate rebellion that was rooted in the defense of Santa Cruz, Indian communal lands taken over by upper class landowners that expanded their plantations by encroaching on Maya communal land. The need for more land followed the economic boom in henequen, or agave, that was followed by the second boom in sugar production. In late 1840, alienation of peasants increased sharply forcing tenants to abandon their own lands and work as indebted laborers on large estates.
The rise of the Cruzob, followers of the Chan Santa Cruz, the Little Cross religious movement, took place in the early 1850s and had its seat of government and shrine in the town called Noh Cah Balam Na Santa Cruz, “The Big Town of the House of the Priest of the Holy Cross.” The shrine was two days’ march through the jungle from Kampocolche, the nearest occupied dzul (foreigners) base. After its fall in 1901 to Mexican forces, the town was renamed Santa Cruz del Bravo; it is now known as Felipe Carillo Puerto. Countless lives were lost on all sides before the Cruzob movement was crushed by the Mexican General Ignacio Bravo, that ended the Caste War on May 5, 1901. General Bravo, on instructions from the government in Mexico City, did implement reforms that stamped out most of the root causes of the Maya rebellion. The conflict ultimately ended in 1915 when the Cruzob recognized the Mexican government.
The history of wars and insurrections in the Yucatán make plain that the indigenous population at large, after three centuries of conflicts and hardships, still regarded Spanish and creoles alike as a foreign domination. As Farris underlines “The Caste War has received its name precisely because it was not a simple peasant rebellion seeking to redress grievances, one that called merely for “bread and land” for “The Mayas could not escape the reality which the caste barrier enforced and preserved, of belonging to a group distinct from the unassimilated overlords” (2). At the core of this unremitting antagonism was the appropriation of socio-economic and political control by the Spaniards and their efforts at spiritual domination through conversion.
Forced evangelization was unrealistic for the Spaniards had limited resources. Fifty years after the first entrada, there were still not enough evangelists for such a large and diverse population, speaking hundreds of languages in towns and villages, spread out from the dry deserts and canyons of the north to the tropical jungles of the south. Hope for peaceful coexistence lingered among the Mayas, but their hopes did not have the same meaning as those of the foreigners, for it was grounded in their ancient religion, their customs and a spirit that did not die with the fierce defenders of their belief, their identity, and their freedom.
References:-
(1) Chamberlain, Robert, S., The Conquest and Colonization of Yucatan, 1947
(2) Farris, Nancy, M., Maya Society Under Colonial Rule, 1984.
Further Reading:-
• Reed, Nelson, A., The Caste War of Yucatán, 2001
• Diego Lopez de Cogolludo (1610), 2006, Historia de Yucatán
• Fray Diego de Landa (1566), 1959, Relación de las Cosas de Yucatán
• Cordurier, Mantilla, Perera, Rodriguez, 2000, Historia y Geografia de Yucatán.
Picture sources:-
• Pix 1, 4, 7, 10, 12, & 13: photos by and © georgefery.com
• Pix 2, 3, 5 & 11: images from Wikipedia
• Pic 6: image © elgrancapitan.org
• Pic 8: image by KrasnyNiejasny in devianart.com
• Pic 9: image © E. Rodrigez Emkun, terciosminiatura.com.